Weak AI visibility with 26 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: content licensing & ai permissions.
Healthcare & Patient AdvocacyHospital & Health CareVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 48/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, RSS/Atom Feed, and Canonical URL Strategy. Priority gaps: Content Licensing & AI Permissions, Speakable Schema, and Image Context for AI. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI43
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
AI can't see your images. It reads the markup around them. A product photo with alt="image1.jpg" tells AI nothing. A figure with a descriptive figcaption and 8-word alt text tells AI exactly what it's looking at - and that context feeds directly into citation decisions.
AI doesn't take your word for it. When you publish content as "Admin" or "Staff Writer," you're telling AI engines that nobody at your company was willing to put their name on it. Person schema, author bios, and credential markup are how you prove a real expert wrote your content.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.