cadena.dev
Comparing v4 vs v5
Mar 22, 2026 → Mar 22, 2026
55
/ 100
→
+459
/ 100
#
Criterion
v4
Status
v5
Status
Delta
1
llms.txt File
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
2
Schema.org Structured Data
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
3
Q&A Content Format
3/10
WEAK
7/10
GOOD
+4
4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
7/10
GOOD
3/10
WEAK
-4
5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
6
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
7
Comprehensive FAQ Section
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
8
Original Data & Expert Analysis
5/10
PARTIAL
7/10
GOOD
+2
9
Internal Linking Structure
8/10
STRONG
8/10
STRONG
0
10
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
11
Content Freshness Signals
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
12
Sitemap Completeness
10/10
STRONG
0/10
MISSING
-10
13
RSS/Atom Feed
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
14
Table & List Extractability
3/10
WEAK
4/10
PARTIAL
+1
15
Definition Patterns
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
16
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
17
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
18
Author & Expert Schema
9/10
STRONG
9/10
STRONG
0
19
Fact & Data Density
8/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
+2
20
Canonical URL Strategy
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
21
Content Publishing Velocity
3/10
WEAK
0/10
MISSING
-3
22
Schema Coverage & Depth
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
23
Speakable Schema
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
24
Query-Answer Alignment
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
25
Content Cannibalization
5/10
PARTIAL
10/10
STRONG
+5
26
Visible Date Signal
3/10
WEAK
8/10
STRONG
+5
27
Topic Coherence
9/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
+1
28
Content Depth
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
5/10
PARTIAL
+4
29
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
30
First-Hand Experience Signals
2/10
POOR
4/10
PARTIAL
+2
31
Creator Transparency
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
32
Methodology Transparency
3/10
WEAK
4/10
PARTIAL
+1
33
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
3/10
WEAK
6/10
MODERATE
+3
34
Answer-First Placement
6/10
MODERATE
4/10
PARTIAL
-2
35
Evidence Packaging
3/10
WEAK
6/10
MODERATE
+3
36
Entity Disambiguation
4/10
PARTIAL
2/10
POOR
-2
37
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
38
Image Context for AI
2/10
POOR
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
-1
39
Duplicate Content Blocks
9/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
+1
40
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
Opportunities
10
v4
10
v5
Added in v5
+ Fix HTML Structure & Enable HTTPS
+ Add Entity Disambiguation
+ Increase Publishing Frequency
Removed since v4
- Restructure Content as Q&A
- Improve Citation-Ready Writing
- Package Evidence for AI
Findings Summary
Criterion
v4 Findings
v5 Findings
Delta
llms.txt File
2
2
0
Schema.org Structured Data
5
4
-1
Q&A Content Format
4
4
0
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5
5
0
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3
3
0
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2
2
0
Comprehensive FAQ Section
3
3
0
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4
4
0
Internal Linking Structure
5
5
0
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6
6
0
Content Freshness Signals
4
4
0
Sitemap Completeness
4
2
-2
RSS/Atom Feed
3
3
0
Table & List Extractability
5
5
0
Definition Patterns
4
4
0
Direct Answer Paragraphs
3
3
0
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
4
4
0
Author & Expert Schema
5
5
0
Fact & Data Density
4
4
0
Canonical URL Strategy
4
4
0
Content Publishing Velocity
3
2
-1
Schema Coverage & Depth
5
5
0
Speakable Schema
2
2
0
Query-Answer Alignment
2
2
0
Content Cannibalization
4
2
-2
Visible Date Signal
3
3
0
Topic Coherence
3
3
0
Content Depth
3
4
+1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
2
2
0
First-Hand Experience Signals
2
2
0
Creator Transparency
2
2
0
Methodology Transparency
2
2
0
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
4
4
0
Answer-First Placement
3
3
0
Evidence Packaging
3
3
0
Entity Disambiguation
3
3
0
Extraction Friction Score
3
3
0
Image Context for AI
3
3
0
Duplicate Content Blocks
2
2
0
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
2
2
0