Weak AI visibility with 1 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
domeapi.io has a minimal technical foundation for discoverability, but it is not AEO-ready in its current state. The site is secure and accessible over HTTPS, and both the homepage and FAQ URL return HTTP 200, but core machine-readable signals are largely absent: `/llms.txt` is 404, `sitemap.xml` is 404, no JSON-LD schema types were detected, and no canonical tag is present. Content extraction signals are also weak, with no H1, no question-style headings, no direct Q&A blocks, no lists or tables, and zero internal links from the homepage. The current overall score of 7 reflects that basic crawl access exists, but the structured and citation-ready layer AI engines rely on is mostly missing.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.