exed.net
Comparing v4 vs v5
Mar 17, 2026 → Mar 22, 2026
43
/ 100
→
-2815
/ 100
#
Criterion
v4
Status
v5
Status
Delta
1
llms.txt File
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
2
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
3
Q&A Content Format
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
0/10
MISSING
-1
4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
3/10
WEAK
0/10
MISSING
-3
5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
PARTIAL
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
-4
6
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
PARTIAL
2/10
POOR
-3
7
Comprehensive FAQ Section
2/10
POOR
0/10
MISSING
-2
8
Original Data & Expert Analysis
6/10
MODERATE
0/10
MISSING
-6
9
Internal Linking Structure
8/10
STRONG
0/10
MISSING
-8
10
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
3/10
WEAK
0/10
MISSING
-3
11
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
POOR
0/10
MISSING
-2
12
Sitemap Completeness
9/10
STRONG
0/10
MISSING
-9
13
RSS/Atom Feed
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
14
Table & List Extractability
3/10
WEAK
0/10
MISSING
-3
15
Definition Patterns
6/10
MODERATE
0/10
MISSING
-6
16
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
PARTIAL
0/10
MISSING
-4
17
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
18
Author & Expert Schema
4/10
PARTIAL
0/10
MISSING
-4
19
Fact & Data Density
8/10
STRONG
0/10
MISSING
-8
20
Canonical URL Strategy
7/10
GOOD
0/10
MISSING
-7
21
Content Publishing Velocity
3/10
WEAK
0/10
MISSING
-3
22
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
23
Speakable Schema
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
24
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
25
Content Cannibalization
3/10
WEAK
5/10
PARTIAL
+2
26
Visible Date Signal
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
27
Topic Coherence
10/10
STRONG
5/10
PARTIAL
-5
28
Content Depth
3/10
WEAK
3/10
WEAK
0
29
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
4/10
PARTIAL
0/10
MISSING
-4
30
Helpful Purpose Alignment
--
N/A
0/10
MISSING
0
31
Answer-First Placement
3/10
WEAK
0/10
MISSING
-3
32
First-Hand Experience Signals
--
N/A
0/10
MISSING
0
33
Evidence Packaging
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
34
Creator Transparency
--
N/A
0/10
MISSING
0
35
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
36
Methodology Transparency
--
N/A
0/10
MISSING
0
37
Extraction Friction Score
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
2/10
POOR
+1
38
Image Context for AI
0/10
MISSING
5/10
PARTIAL
+5
39
Duplicate Content Blocks
--
N/A
10/10
STRONG
+10
40
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
--
N/A
5/10
PARTIAL
+5
Opportunities
10
v4
10
v5
Added in v5
+ Focus Content on Core Topics
+ Add Structured Tables & Lists
+ Increase Fact & Data Density
+ Improve Internal Linking Architecture
Removed since v4
- Add Content Freshness Signals
- Add Schema.org Structured Data
- Package Evidence for AI
- Improve Question-Answer Alignment
Findings Summary
Criterion
v4 Findings
v5 Findings
Delta
llms.txt File
2
2
0
Schema.org Structured Data
2
2
0
Q&A Content Format
3
3
0
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5
5
0
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3
3
0
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2
2
0
Comprehensive FAQ Section
3
3
0
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4
4
0
Internal Linking Structure
5
5
0
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
7
8
+1
Content Freshness Signals
4
4
0
Sitemap Completeness
4
2
-2
RSS/Atom Feed
2
2
0
Table & List Extractability
5
4
-1
Definition Patterns
4
4
0
Direct Answer Paragraphs
3
3
0
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
4
4
0
Author & Expert Schema
5
5
0
Fact & Data Density
4
4
0
Canonical URL Strategy
4
2
-2
Content Publishing Velocity
2
2
0
Schema Coverage & Depth
2
2
0
Speakable Schema
2
2
0
Query-Answer Alignment
2
2
0
Content Cannibalization
2
2
0
Visible Date Signal
2
2
0
Topic Coherence
3
2
-1
Content Depth
3
2
-1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
3
2
-1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
--
2
--
Answer-First Placement
3
3
0
First-Hand Experience Signals
--
2
--
Evidence Packaging
3
3
0
Creator Transparency
--
2
--
Entity Disambiguation
3
3
0
Methodology Transparency
--
2
--
Extraction Friction Score
4
2
-2
Image Context for AI
3
2
-1
Duplicate Content Blocks
--
2
--
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
--
2
--