Weak AI visibility with 3 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
futureclinic.com has a usable technical base (HTTPS enabled, crawlable text content, and 14 internal links), but it is not currently AEO-ready at scale. Core machine-readable discovery signals are missing: /llms.txt returns 404, /sitemap.xml returns 404, no JSON-LD blocks were detected (schema_block_count: 0), and no canonical tag is present. Content includes some factual density and FAQ-like material, but extraction and trust signals are weak due to no question headings, no dedicated /faq page (404), missing publication date markup, and absent author/entity schema.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.