golden.com
Comparing v5 vs v6
Mar 22, 2026 → Mar 23, 2026
46
/ 100
→
+147
/ 100
#
Criterion
v5
Status
v6
Status
Delta
1
llms.txt File
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
2
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
3
Q&A Content Format
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
0
4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
8/10
STRONG
8/10
STRONG
0
5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
6
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
7
Comprehensive FAQ Section
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
8
Original Data & Expert Analysis
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
9
Internal Linking Structure
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
10
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
11
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
12
Sitemap Completeness
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
13
RSS/Atom Feed
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
14
Table & List Extractability
8/10
STRONG
7/10
GOOD
-1
15
Definition Patterns
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
16
Direct Answer Paragraphs
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
17
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
18
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
19
Fact & Data Density
8/10
STRONG
6/10
MODERATE
-2
20
Canonical URL Strategy
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
21
Content Publishing Velocity
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
22
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
23
Speakable Schema
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
24
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
25
Content Cannibalization
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
26
Visible Date Signal
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
27
Topic Coherence
3/10
WEAK
5/10
PARTIAL
+2
28
Content Depth
7/10
GOOD
8/10
STRONG
+1
29
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
30
First-Hand Experience Signals
3/10
WEAK
3/10
WEAK
0
31
Creator Transparency
3/10
WEAK
3/10
WEAK
0
32
Methodology Transparency
3/10
WEAK
3/10
WEAK
0
33
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
34
Answer-First Placement
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
35
Evidence Packaging
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
36
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
37
Extraction Friction Score
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
38
Image Context for AI
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
0
39
Duplicate Content Blocks
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
40
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
5/10
PARTIAL
7/10
GOOD
+2
Opportunities
10
v5
10
v6
Same opportunities in both versions.
Findings Summary
Criterion
v5 Findings
v6 Findings
Delta
llms.txt File
2
2
0
Schema.org Structured Data
2
2
0
Q&A Content Format
3
3
0
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5
5
0
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3
3
0
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2
2
0
Comprehensive FAQ Section
4
4
0
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4
4
0
Internal Linking Structure
5
5
0
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
7
7
0
Content Freshness Signals
4
4
0
Sitemap Completeness
2
2
0
RSS/Atom Feed
2
2
0
Table & List Extractability
7
7
0
Definition Patterns
4
4
0
Direct Answer Paragraphs
3
3
0
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
4
4
0
Author & Expert Schema
5
5
0
Fact & Data Density
4
4
0
Canonical URL Strategy
4
4
0
Content Publishing Velocity
2
2
0
Schema Coverage & Depth
2
2
0
Speakable Schema
2
2
0
Query-Answer Alignment
2
2
0
Content Cannibalization
4
4
0
Visible Date Signal
2
2
0
Topic Coherence
4
4
0
Content Depth
4
3
-1
Helpful Purpose Alignment
2
2
0
First-Hand Experience Signals
2
2
0
Creator Transparency
2
2
0
Methodology Transparency
2
2
0
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
3
3
0
Answer-First Placement
3
3
0
Evidence Packaging
3
3
0
Entity Disambiguation
3
3
0
Extraction Friction Score
3
3
0
Image Context for AI
3
3
0
Duplicate Content Blocks
2
2
0
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
5
4
-1