greena.world
Comparing v5 vs v6
Mar 22, 2026 → Mar 23, 2026
44
/ 100
→
+549
/ 100
#
Criterion
v5
Status
v6
Status
Delta
1
llms.txt File
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
2
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
3
Q&A Content Format
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
6
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
3/10
WEAK
3/10
WEAK
0
7
Comprehensive FAQ Section
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
8
Original Data & Expert Analysis
3/10
WEAK
7/10
GOOD
+4
9
Internal Linking Structure
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
10
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
8/10
STRONG
8/10
STRONG
0
11
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
12
Sitemap Completeness
8/10
STRONG
8/10
STRONG
0
13
RSS/Atom Feed
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
14
Table & List Extractability
3/10
WEAK
8/10
STRONG
+5
15
Definition Patterns
0/10
MISSING
5/10
PARTIAL
+5
16
Direct Answer Paragraphs
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
17
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
18
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
19
Fact & Data Density
8/10
STRONG
8/10
STRONG
0
20
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
21
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
22
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
23
Speakable Schema
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
24
Query-Answer Alignment
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
25
Content Cannibalization
5/10
PARTIAL
10/10
STRONG
+5
26
Visible Date Signal
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
27
Topic Coherence
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
28
Content Depth
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
29
Helpful Purpose Alignment
6/10
MODERATE
5/10
PARTIAL
-1
30
First-Hand Experience Signals
3/10
WEAK
2/10
POOR
-1
31
Creator Transparency
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
2/10
POOR
+1
32
Methodology Transparency
3/10
WEAK
2/10
POOR
-1
33
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
5/10
PARTIAL
6/10
MODERATE
+1
34
Answer-First Placement
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
35
Evidence Packaging
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
36
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
37
Extraction Friction Score
3/10
WEAK
4/10
PARTIAL
+1
38
Image Context for AI
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
0
39
Duplicate Content Blocks
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
40
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
Opportunities
10
v5
10
v6
Added in v6
+ Strengthen Entity Authority (NAP)
+ Add Direct Answer Paragraphs
Removed since v5
- Add Structured Tables & Lists
- Add Definition-Style Content
Findings Summary
Criterion
v5 Findings
v6 Findings
Delta
llms.txt File
2
2
0
Schema.org Structured Data
2
2
0
Q&A Content Format
3
4
+1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5
5
0
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
4
4
0
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2
2
0
Comprehensive FAQ Section
4
4
0
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4
4
0
Internal Linking Structure
5
5
0
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6
6
0
Content Freshness Signals
4
4
0
Sitemap Completeness
4
4
0
RSS/Atom Feed
2
2
0
Table & List Extractability
5
7
+2
Definition Patterns
4
4
0
Direct Answer Paragraphs
3
3
0
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
4
4
0
Author & Expert Schema
5
5
0
Fact & Data Density
4
4
0
Canonical URL Strategy
2
2
0
Content Publishing Velocity
3
3
0
Schema Coverage & Depth
2
2
0
Speakable Schema
2
2
0
Query-Answer Alignment
2
2
0
Content Cannibalization
2
2
0
Visible Date Signal
2
2
0
Topic Coherence
3
3
0
Content Depth
3
3
0
Helpful Purpose Alignment
2
2
0
First-Hand Experience Signals
2
2
0
Creator Transparency
2
2
0
Methodology Transparency
2
2
0
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
4
4
0
Answer-First Placement
3
3
0
Evidence Packaging
4
4
0
Entity Disambiguation
3
3
0
Extraction Friction Score
3
3
0
Image Context for AI
3
3
0
Duplicate Content Blocks
2
2
0
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
2
2
0