Weak AI visibility with 29 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: content licensing & ai permissions.
Developer Tools & InfrastructureAI & ML PlatformsVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 49/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Schema.org Structured Data, and Sitemap Completeness. Priority gaps: Content Licensing & AI Permissions, Speakable Schema, and Owned Data Density. Topic coherence is 4/10, which caps the overall score at 55. Focusing content on core expertise areas is the single highest-impact improvement.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI36
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
AI engines distrust content that makes claims without explaining how those claims were derived. "Our product is rated #1" means nothing without methodology. "We tested 12 platforms over 6 weeks using 4 criteria" means everything. Methodology Transparency measures whether your content shows the process behind its conclusions.
AI can't see your images. It reads the markup around them. A product photo with alt="image1.jpg" tells AI nothing. A figure with a descriptive figcaption and 8-word alt text tells AI exactly what it's looking at - and that context feeds directly into citation decisions.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.