Weak AI visibility with 26 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Design & CollaborationDesign ToolsVerdict
Critical AEO gaps at 44/100 - illuminant.ai is largely invisible to AI engines. Key strengths include Canonical URL Strategy, Content Cannibalization, and Duplicate Content Blocks. Priority gaps: llms.txt File, Content Licensing & AI Permissions, and Speakable Schema. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI44
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
A 300-word page cannot compete with a 3,000-word deep dive for an AI citation. Content Depth measures the substance on your pages - word counts, heading structure, and the ratio of deep pages to thin ones across your site.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.