Moderate AI visibility with 28 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: q&a content format.
Healthcare & Patient AdvocacyMedical PracticeVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 50/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Schema.org Structured Data, and Internal Linking Structure. Priority gaps: Q&A Content Format, Content Licensing & AI Permissions, and Speakable Schema. HTTPS is not enabled, which caps several criteria scores and reduces AI crawler trust. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI35
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
AI can't see your images. It reads the markup around them. A product photo with alt="image1.jpg" tells AI nothing. A figure with a descriptive figcaption and 8-word alt text tells AI exactly what it's looking at - and that context feeds directly into citation decisions.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.