RSS Feed Presence & Quality
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Questions this article answers
- ?Do I need an RSS feed for AI search engines to find my new content?
- ?How does an RSS feed help with faster indexing by AI crawlers?
- ?What should a good RSS feed include for AI visibility?
Summarize This Article With AI
Open this article in your preferred AI engine for an instant summary and analysis.
Quick Answer
An RSS 2.0 or Atom feed at a discoverable URL lets AI indexing systems detect new and updated content automatically. We check for feed existence, the link tag in HTML head, item count, and pubDate presence per item. No feed? You're waiting for the next scheduled crawl.
Before & After
Before - No RSS feed, no auto-discovery
<!-- No <link> tag in <head> --> <!-- /feed or /rss.xml returns 404 -->
After - Valid RSS with auto-discovery
<head>
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml"
title="Blog" href="/rss.xml" />
</head>
<!-- /rss.xml serves valid RSS 2.0 with
50+ items, each with title, link,
pubDate, and content:encoded -->What This Actually Measures
We're evaluating four dimensions: existence (does a feed exist at all?), discoverability (can automated systems find it without a human pointing the way?), completeness (does each item carry the metadata indexing systems need?), and freshness (does the feed reflect recent publishing activity?).
The audit checks common feed URLs by convention -/rss, /rss.xml, /feed, /feed.xml, /atom.xml, /index.xml -and also parses the HTML <head> for <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml"> or <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml"> tags. If a feed is found through the link tag but not at a conventional URL, discoverability scores lower -some automated consumers only check the conventional paths.
For each feed item, we validate the presence of required fields: title, link, description (or content:encoded for full content), and pubDate (or dc:date for Atom). Optional but scored fields include guid, author, and category. The channel-level lastBuildDate and generator tag also get checked.
Beyond field presence, we validate well-formedness against the RSS 2.0 or Atom spec. The culprits we see most often: XML namespace errors, unescaped HTML in description fields, malformed date strings, and missing XML declarations. A syntactically invalid feed gets silently dropped by consumers -no error visible to you, the publisher.
Why Your Publishing Speed Depends on This
RSS feeds are a real-time notification channel for AI indexing pipelines. Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS tells them what changed recently. Several major AI companies operate feed-based indexing systems that poll RSS feeds every 1-6 hours to detect new content faster than a full site recrawl.
Perplexity's indexing system uses RSS feeds as one of its primary content discovery mechanisms. Sites with valid feeds see new content indexed within hours, not days. Google's Pubsubhubbub/WebSub protocol pushes feed updates to subscribers in near real-time. Without a feed, your new content waits for the next scheduled crawl -which for smaller sites can mean days or weeks.
Feed quality directly impacts how AI systems process your updates. A feed with 200 items containing full article text in content:encoded gives AI systems enough content to evaluate relevance without visiting each page individually. A feed with only 10 items and bare-minimum title/link fields forces the AI to crawl each page separately -slower, less reliable.
Item count matters strategically too. A feed with only 5 recent items gives AI systems a tiny window. If your publishing cadence produces 3 new pages between crawl cycles but your feed only holds 5 items, older items rotate out before they're discovered. We recommend 50-100 items -a comfortable buffer for indexing latency.
How We Check This
Feed discovery runs two parallel methods. First, we check conventional URLs by sending HEAD requests to /rss, /rss.xml, /feed, /feed.xml, /atom.xml, /blog/rss, and /blog/feed, looking for 200 responses with XML or RSS content types. Second, we parse the homepage HTML for any <link rel="alternate"> tags with RSS or Atom MIME types.
When a feed is found, the full XML goes through a multi-stage validation pipeline. Stage one: XML well-formedness -does the document parse without syntax errors? Stage two: specification validation -required channel-level and per-item elements checked against RSS 2.0 or Atom 1.0. Stage three: semantic validation -are item links valid URLs, are pubDates in the right format (RFC 822 for RSS, RFC 3339 for Atom), do GUIDs appear genuinely unique?
We also evaluate content depth. For each item, we measure whether a description or summary exists and whether it contains meaningful text (more than 50 characters) or just a truncated teaser. Items with content:encoded containing full article HTML get the highest depth score. Average content depth across all items becomes a key sub-metric.
Finally, we check feed freshness -the pubDate of the most recent item compared against today. If the newest item is more than 90 days old, the feed is flagged as stale. The channel-level lastBuildDate tells me whether the feed generation system is still active at all.
How We Score It
RSS scoring evaluates four dimensions on a 10-point scale:
1. Feed existence and discoverability (3 points): - Feed exists AND is discoverable via HTML link tag: 3/3 points - Feed exists at a conventional URL but no link tag in HTML: 2/3 points - Feed exists only at an unconventional URL, no link tag: 1/3 points - No feed found: 0/3 points
2. Feed validity and well-formedness (2 points): - Valid XML, passes spec validation, no errors: 2/2 points - Valid XML with minor spec warnings (missing optional fields): 1.5/2 points - Parseable but with spec errors (missing required fields): 1/2 points - XML parsing errors or invalid structure: 0/2 points
3. Item completeness and content depth (3 points): - All items have title, link, pubDate, and meaningful description/content (100+ chars): 3/3 points - All items have title and link, 80%+ have pubDate and description: 2/3 points - Most items have title and link but pubDates or descriptions are sparse: 1/3 points - Items missing title or link fields: 0/3 points
4. Feed freshness and item count (2 points): - Most recent item within 30 days AND 20+ items: 2/2 points - Most recent item within 90 days OR 10-19 items: 1.5/2 points - Most recent item within 180 days AND fewer than 10 items: 1/2 points - Most recent item older than 180 days or feed abandoned: 0/2 points
No feed at all = 0/10. Most WordPress sites with defaults score 5-7 due to auto-generated feeds with limited item metadata.
Resources
Key Takeaways
- Publish a valid RSS 2.0 or Atom feed and add an auto-discovery <link> tag in your HTML head.
- Include full article content in content:encoded - not just titles and truncated teasers.
- Keep at least 50 items in your feed so new content is not rotated out before crawlers discover it.
- Add pubDate to every feed item - undated entries are deprioritized by indexing pipelines.
How does your site score on this criterion?
Get a free AEO audit and see where you stand across all 10 criteria.