Moderate AI visibility with 33 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: content licensing & ai permissions.
Healthcare & Patient AdvocacyHealth & WellnessVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 59/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Schema.org Structured Data, and Q&A Content Format. Priority gaps: Content Licensing & AI Permissions, Speakable Schema, and Owned Data Density.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI36
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
AI engines increasingly prioritize content from people who have direct experience with their topic. Generic "top 10 best" listicles written from secondhand research score poorly. Pages with specific actions taken, limitations discovered, and numeric results earned score well. First-Hand Experience Signals measure whether your content shows evidence of real-world involvement.
Anonymous content is untrusted content. AI engines check for author bylines, bio links, reviewer credits, and Person schema to decide whether a page comes from a credible creator. Creator Transparency measures how clearly your content identifies its authors and their qualifications.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.