Weak AI visibility with 0 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
oliolabs.co is currently at the very early stage of AEO readiness, with an overall score of 2 and only 3 of 22 criteria scoring above zero. Core machine-consumption signals are missing, including llms.txt (404), robots.txt (404), sitemap.xml (404), and any JSON-LD schema (0 blocks, 0 types). On-page extractability is also weak, with 0 H1 tags, 0 internal links, 0 FAQ content, and no direct-answer formatting. The current setup limits both discoverability and answer eligibility in AI-driven search and assistant experiences.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Most AI crawlers don't run JavaScript. If your content loads after page render -behind accordions, SPAs, or API calls -you're invisible. We've seen entire FAQ sections vanish from AI's perspective because of one accordion widget.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.