openmotors.co
Comparing v3 vs v4
Mar 17, 2026 → Mar 22, 2026
50
/ 100
→
+656
/ 100
#
Criterion
v3
Status
v4
Status
Delta
1
llms.txt File
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
2
Schema.org Structured Data
9/10
STRONG
9/10
STRONG
0
3
Q&A Content Format
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
0/10
MISSING
-1
4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
6
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
7
Comprehensive FAQ Section
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
8
Original Data & Expert Analysis
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
9
Internal Linking Structure
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
10
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
11
Content Freshness Signals
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
12
Sitemap Completeness
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
13
RSS/Atom Feed
6/10
MODERATE
6/10
MODERATE
0
14
Table & List Extractability
3/10
WEAK
5/10
PARTIAL
+2
15
Definition Patterns
3/10
WEAK
5/10
PARTIAL
+2
16
Direct Answer Paragraphs
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
17
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
18
Author & Expert Schema
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
19
Fact & Data Density
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
20
Canonical URL Strategy
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
21
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
22
Schema Coverage & Depth
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
23
Speakable Schema
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
24
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
25
Content Cannibalization
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
26
Visible Date Signal
7/10
GOOD
3/10
WEAK
-4
27
Topic Coherence
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
28
Content Depth
3/10
WEAK
3/10
WEAK
0
29
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
4/10
PARTIAL
8/10
STRONG
+4
30
Helpful Purpose Alignment
--
N/A
9/10
STRONG
+9
31
Answer-First Placement
6/10
MODERATE
10/10
STRONG
+4
32
First-Hand Experience Signals
--
N/A
5/10
PARTIAL
+5
33
Evidence Packaging
3/10
WEAK
4/10
PARTIAL
+1
34
Creator Transparency
--
N/A
7/10
GOOD
+7
35
Entity Disambiguation
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
36
Methodology Transparency
--
N/A
4/10
PARTIAL
+4
37
Extraction Friction Score
3/10
WEAK
3/10
WEAK
0
38
Image Context for AI
3/10
WEAK
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
-2
39
Duplicate Content Blocks
--
N/A
10/10
STRONG
+10
40
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
--
N/A
5/10
PARTIAL
+5
Opportunities
10
v3
10
v4
Added in v4
+ Add Entity Disambiguation
+ Reduce Extraction Friction
+ Increase Publishing Frequency
Removed since v3
- Improve Citation-Ready Writing
- Package Evidence for AI
- Strengthen Entity Authority (NAP)
Findings Summary
Criterion
v3 Findings
v4 Findings
Delta
llms.txt File
3
3
0
Schema.org Structured Data
4
4
0
Q&A Content Format
3
3
0
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5
5
0
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3
3
0
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2
2
0
Comprehensive FAQ Section
4
4
0
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4
4
0
Internal Linking Structure
5
5
0
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6
6
0
Content Freshness Signals
4
4
0
Sitemap Completeness
4
4
0
RSS/Atom Feed
2
2
0
Table & List Extractability
5
5
0
Definition Patterns
4
4
0
Direct Answer Paragraphs
3
3
0
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
4
4
0
Author & Expert Schema
5
5
0
Fact & Data Density
4
4
0
Canonical URL Strategy
4
4
0
Content Publishing Velocity
2
2
0
Schema Coverage & Depth
5
5
0
Speakable Schema
2
2
0
Query-Answer Alignment
2
2
0
Content Cannibalization
2
2
0
Visible Date Signal
2
3
+1
Topic Coherence
2
2
0
Content Depth
2
2
0
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
3
3
0
Helpful Purpose Alignment
--
2
--
Answer-First Placement
3
3
0
First-Hand Experience Signals
--
2
--
Evidence Packaging
3
3
0
Creator Transparency
--
2
--
Entity Disambiguation
3
3
0
Methodology Transparency
--
2
--
Extraction Friction Score
3
3
0
Image Context for AI
3
3
0
Duplicate Content Blocks
--
2
--
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
--
2
--