Moderate AI visibility with 12 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: sitemap completeness.
Verdict
outsailtech.com has a mixed AEO profile: strong machine-readable foundations are in place, but key discoverability and trust signals are still missing. The site performs well on llms.txt (200 status, 2,850 chars), robots.txt AI crawler permissions, and schema depth (28 unique properties across Organization/WebPage/WebSite/BreadcrumbList), plus high factual density (96 quantitative data points). However, critical blockers remain, including no HTTPS support, missing sitemap.xml (status 509), and a cross-domain canonical (`https://24gen.space/`) that can dilute authority. Content is information-rich but under-optimized for answer engines due to zero question headings, weak direct-answer formatting, and no dedicated FAQ endpoint (`/faq` returns 404).
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
AI doesn't take your word for it. When you publish content as "Admin" or "Staff Writer," you're telling AI engines that nobody at your company was willing to put their name on it. Person schema, author bios, and credential markup are how you prove a real expert wrote your content.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.