Weak AI visibility with 24 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: content licensing & ai permissions.
Biotech & PharmaceuticalsBiotechnologyVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 48/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Internal Linking Structure, and Canonical URL Strategy. Priority gaps: Content Licensing & AI Permissions, Speakable Schema, and Query-Answer Alignment. Topic coherence is 4/10, which caps the overall score at 55. Focusing content on core expertise areas is the single highest-impact improvement.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI41
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
You wrote a 3,000-word guide on "customer support automation." But people ask AI "how do I reduce support ticket volume?" If your content doesn't match the actual queries, AI can't connect the dots.
A statistic without a source is a liability. A claim without attribution is invisible. We track evidence packaging across every audit and the pattern is clear - sites that cite their sources get cited by AI. Sites that state facts without attribution get skipped.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.