revyl.ai
Comparing v3 vs v4
Mar 10, 2026 → Mar 17, 2026
34
/ 100
→
+1347
/ 100
#
Criterion
v3
Status
v4
Status
Delta
1
llms.txt File
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
2
Schema.org Structured Data
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
3
Q&A Content Format
2/10
POOR
7/10
GOOD
+5
4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
7/10
GOOD
9/10
STRONG
+2
5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3/10
WEAK
5/10
PARTIAL
+2
6
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
PARTIAL
2/10
POOR
-3
7
Comprehensive FAQ Section
0/10
MISSING
4/10
PARTIAL
+4
8
Original Data & Expert Analysis
6/10
MODERATE
3/10
WEAK
-3
9
Internal Linking Structure
5/10
PARTIAL
6/10
MODERATE
+1
10
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
PARTIAL
6/10
MODERATE
+2
11
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
12
Sitemap Completeness
6/10
MODERATE
2/10
POOR
-4
13
RSS/Atom Feed
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
14
Table & List Extractability
0/10
MISSING
8/10
STRONG
+8
15
Definition Patterns
7/10
GOOD
0/10
MISSING
-7
16
Direct Answer Paragraphs
0/10
MISSING
4/10
PARTIAL
+4
17
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
18
Author & Expert Schema
2/10
POOR
0/10
MISSING
-2
19
Fact & Data Density
6/10
MODERATE
8/10
STRONG
+2
20
Canonical URL Strategy
0/10
MISSING
7/10
GOOD
+7
21
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
22
Schema Coverage & Depth
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
23
Speakable Schema
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
24
Query-Answer Alignment
5/10
PARTIAL
0/10
MISSING
-5
25
Content Cannibalization
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
26
Visible Date Signal
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
27
Topic Coherence
5/10
PARTIAL
10/10
STRONG
+5
28
Content Depth
2/10
POOR
8/10
STRONG
+6
29
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
--
N/A
5/10
PARTIAL
+5
30
Answer-First Placement
--
N/A
3/10
WEAK
+3
31
Evidence Packaging
--
N/A
4/10
PARTIAL
+4
32
Entity Disambiguation
--
N/A
0/10
MISSING
0
33
Extraction Friction Score
--
N/A
6/10
MODERATE
+6
34
Image Context for AI
--
N/A
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
+1
Opportunities
10
v3
10
v4
Added in v4
+ Improve Question-Answer Alignment
+ Enhance Author & Expert Schema
+ Add Answer-First Placement
+ Create llms.txt File
Removed since v3
- Focus Content on Core Topics
- Increase Content Depth
- Restructure Content as Q&A
- Add Structured Tables & Lists
Findings Summary
Criterion
v3 Findings
v4 Findings
Delta
llms.txt File
2
2
0
Schema.org Structured Data
2
2
0
Q&A Content Format
3
3
0
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5
5
0
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
3
4
+1
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2
2
0
Comprehensive FAQ Section
3
4
+1
Original Data & Expert Analysis
5
4
-1
Internal Linking Structure
5
5
0
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
8
6
-2
Content Freshness Signals
4
4
0
Sitemap Completeness
4
3
-1
RSS/Atom Feed
2
2
0
Table & List Extractability
4
7
+3
Definition Patterns
4
4
0
Direct Answer Paragraphs
3
3
0
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
4
4
0
Author & Expert Schema
5
5
0
Fact & Data Density
4
4
0
Canonical URL Strategy
2
4
+2
Content Publishing Velocity
2
2
0
Schema Coverage & Depth
2
2
0
Speakable Schema
2
2
0
Query-Answer Alignment
2
2
0
Content Cannibalization
2
2
0
Visible Date Signal
2
2
0
Topic Coherence
3
3
0
Content Depth
2
3
+1
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
--
4
--
Answer-First Placement
--
3
--
Evidence Packaging
--
3
--
Entity Disambiguation
--
3
--
Extraction Friction Score
--
4
--
Image Context for AI
--
3
--