Weak AI visibility with 6 of 10 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
sarahcare.com has a crawlable WordPress foundation with Yoast schema, XML sitemaps, and a dedicated FAQs URL, but it is missing AI-specific governance and rich answer markup. The site returns HTTP 404 for /llms.txt and has no crawler-specific AI directives in robots.txt. Entity and navigation signals are present, yet FAQPage/HowTo and deeper expert-data assets are limited, which caps answer-engine visibility.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Most sites run default platform robots.txt with zero AI-specific rules. That's not a strategy -it's an accident. Explicit Allow rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot signal that your content is open for citation.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.