Strong AI visibility with 10 of 10 criteria passing. All criteria met.
Verdict
understoodcare.com shows strong AEO readiness with an overall score of 83, backed by solid crawlability and AI discoverability fundamentals. Key technical signals are in place, including `llms.txt` (HTTP 200, 5,438 chars), `robots.txt` (HTTP 200) with explicit AI crawler allowances, HTTPS, and substantial indexable text content (19,760 characters on the homepage). The biggest gaps are in answer formatting for question-led content, limited schema breadth (only Organization and WebSite on the homepage), and consistency signals like multiple phone numbers. Improving semantic accessibility coverage and adding proof-oriented content assets would materially increase AI answer confidence and citation likelihood.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
A page built with <div> everywhere looks the same to AI as a page with no structure at all. Semantic elements -<main>, <article>, <section>, <time> -are the markup that tells AI where your content starts, what it means, and how it's organized.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
AI systems don't cite websites -they cite entities. A verifiable business with an address, named authors, and social proof. Our self-audit (88/100) still loses points here because we lack a physical address. That's how strict this criterion is.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.