Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
usemod.ai has foundational technical hygiene in place, but it is not yet AEO-ready at a competitive level. Core discoverability assets are present, including HTTPS, a valid `robots.txt` (HTTP 200), a 64-URL sitemap with `lastmod`, organization schema (3 JSON-LD blocks), and a correct self-referencing canonical URL. However, critical AI-consumption signals are missing: no valid `/llms.txt`, no `/ai.txt`, no FAQPage schema, no question-answer formatting, no H1, no semantic sectioning (`<main>`, `<nav>`, `<footer>`), no RSS feed, and zero internal links on the homepage. The current setup supports crawlability, but not extractability or citation readiness for AI engines.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
AI crawlers follow internal links to discover and contextualize content. A page with zero inbound links is a page AI will never find. Hub pages linking to 20+ related articles signal topical authority that both engines reward.
Your homepage has perfect JSON-LD. Your other 200 pages? Zero. Here's how we measure the gap -and why AI engines judge your whole domain by it.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.