usenourish.com
Comparing v3 vs v4
Mar 17, 2026 → Mar 23, 2026
68
/ 100
→
+371
/ 100
#
Criterion
v3
Status
v4
Status
Delta
1
llms.txt File
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
2
Schema.org Structured Data
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
3
Q&A Content Format
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
4
Clean, Crawlable HTML
9/10
STRONG
9/10
STRONG
0
5
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
6
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
7
Comprehensive FAQ Section
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
8
Original Data & Expert Analysis
8/10
STRONG
8/10
STRONG
0
9
Internal Linking Structure
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
10
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
11
Content Freshness Signals
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
12
Sitemap Completeness
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
13
RSS/Atom Feed
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
14
Table & List Extractability
5/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
0
15
Definition Patterns
7/10
GOOD
7/10
GOOD
0
16
Direct Answer Paragraphs
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
17
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
4/10
PARTIAL
4/10
PARTIAL
0
18
Author & Expert Schema
4/10
PARTIAL
9/10
STRONG
+5
19
Fact & Data Density
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
20
Canonical URL Strategy
10/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
0
21
Content Publishing Velocity
2/10
POOR
2/10
POOR
0
22
Schema Coverage & Depth
8/10
STRONG
8/10
STRONG
0
23
Speakable Schema
0/10
MISSING
0/10
MISSING
0
24
Query-Answer Alignment
4/10
PARTIAL
10/10
STRONG
+6
25
Content Cannibalization
9/10
STRONG
5/10
PARTIAL
-4
26
Visible Date Signal
7/10
GOOD
8/10
STRONG
+1
27
Topic Coherence
8/10
STRONG
7/10
GOOD
-1
28
Content Depth
8/10
STRONG
10/10
STRONG
+2
29
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
6/10
MODERATE
8/10
STRONG
+2
30
Helpful Purpose Alignment
--
N/A
6/10
MODERATE
+6
31
Answer-First Placement
3/10
WEAK
3/10
WEAK
0
32
First-Hand Experience Signals
--
N/A
4/10
PARTIAL
+4
33
Evidence Packaging
5/10
PARTIAL
8/10
STRONG
+3
34
Creator Transparency
--
N/A
5/10
PARTIAL
+5
35
Entity Disambiguation
2/10
POOR
6/10
MODERATE
+4
36
Methodology Transparency
--
N/A
4/10
PARTIAL
+4
37
Extraction Friction Score
4/10
PARTIAL
5/10
PARTIAL
+1
38
Image Context for AI
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
1/10
NEARLY EMPTY
0
39
Duplicate Content Blocks
--
N/A
7/10
GOOD
+7
40
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
--
N/A
7/10
GOOD
+7
Opportunities
10
v3
10
v4
Added in v4
+ Focus Content on Core Topics
+ Implement Semantic HTML5
+ Fix Duplicate Content Blocks
+ Reduce Extraction Friction
+ Resolve Content Cannibalization
Removed since v3
- Improve Question-Answer Alignment
- Enhance Author & Expert Schema
- Improve Citation-Ready Writing
- Add Entity Disambiguation
- Package Evidence for AI
Findings Summary
Criterion
v3 Findings
v4 Findings
Delta
llms.txt File
3
3
0
Schema.org Structured Data
5
5
0
Q&A Content Format
3
4
+1
Clean, Crawlable HTML
5
5
0
Entity Authority & NAP Consistency
4
4
0
robots.txt for AI Crawlers
2
2
0
Comprehensive FAQ Section
5
5
0
Original Data & Expert Analysis
4
4
0
Internal Linking Structure
5
5
0
Semantic HTML5 & Accessibility
6
6
0
Content Freshness Signals
4
4
0
Sitemap Completeness
4
4
0
RSS/Atom Feed
2
2
0
Table & List Extractability
5
5
0
Definition Patterns
4
4
0
Direct Answer Paragraphs
3
3
0
Content Licensing & AI Permissions
4
4
0
Author & Expert Schema
5
5
0
Fact & Data Density
4
4
0
Canonical URL Strategy
4
4
0
Content Publishing Velocity
2
2
0
Schema Coverage & Depth
5
5
0
Speakable Schema
2
2
0
Query-Answer Alignment
2
2
0
Content Cannibalization
2
4
+2
Visible Date Signal
2
2
0
Topic Coherence
3
4
+1
Content Depth
3
3
0
Citation-Ready Writing Quality
4
4
0
Helpful Purpose Alignment
--
2
--
Answer-First Placement
3
3
0
First-Hand Experience Signals
--
2
--
Evidence Packaging
3
4
+1
Creator Transparency
--
2
--
Entity Disambiguation
3
3
0
Methodology Transparency
--
2
--
Extraction Friction Score
4
3
-1
Image Context for AI
3
3
0
Duplicate Content Blocks
--
4
--
Cross-Page Duplicate Content
--
4
--