Weak AI visibility with 1 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
you-shift.com has basic crawlability in place (HTTPS is enabled, and both robots.txt and sitemap.xml return HTTP 200), but AEO readiness is currently very low overall at 8/100. The core machine-readable layer is missing: no llms.txt, no JSON-LD schema blocks, no canonical tag, and no AI-permissions file. Content is also hard for AI systems to extract and cite, with 0 H1 tags, 0 internal links, 0 FAQ schema, 0 tables/lists, and no quantifiable facts or freshness signals. The fastest path forward is to implement technical discovery files and schema first, then restructure content into answer-first, entity-rich formats.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.