Weak AI visibility with 3 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
adaptional.com has a solid technical base for crawlability, but overall AEO readiness is low because core machine-readable signals are largely absent. The site serves HTTPS, has semantic structure (`main`, `nav`, `header`, `footer`, `section`), and exposes substantial indexable text (11,173 characters), but it returns 404 for `/llms.txt`, `/sitemap.xml`, and `/faq`. It currently has zero JSON-LD schema blocks, no canonical tag, no RSS/Atom feed, and no explicit AI crawler directives in `robots.txt`, which limits how AI engines interpret and cite content. In short: readable by crawlers, but not packaged for AI extraction, trust, and attribution.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.