Weak AI visibility with 5 of 10 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
adc.doralhw.org has baseline technical crawlability with a live sitemap, server-rendered pages, and basic JSON-LD (WebSite, Organization, BreadcrumbList, Article). However, core AEO assets are missing: `llms.txt` returns 404, `/faq` and `/frequently-asked-questions` both return 404, and there is no FAQPage/HowTo structured data. The site is indexable for traditional search, but it needs AI-crawler directives, machine-readable Q&A content, and stronger expert/citation signals to compete in AI answer engines.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Most sites run default platform robots.txt with zero AI-specific rules. That's not a strategy -it's an accident. Explicit Allow rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot signal that your content is open for citation.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.