Weak AI visibility with 10 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
answerthis.io shows strong crawl fundamentals but low AEO readiness overall. Technical discoverability is solid with HTTPS, a valid robots.txt (200), a self-referencing canonical URL, and a large active sitemap (438 URLs, including 267 updated in the last 90 days). However, core machine-readable signals are missing: no llms.txt, no JSON-LD blocks (schema_block_count: 0), no RSS/Atom feed, and no ai.txt policy file. Content volume is high, but extractability and trust signals need structure improvements such as Q&A formatting, FAQ schema, author/entity schema depth, and freshness markup.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.