Weak AI visibility with 16 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Developer Tools & InfrastructureAI & ML PlatformsVerdict
Critical AEO gaps at 35/100 - asgard.ai is largely invisible to AI engines. Key strengths include Query-Answer Alignment, Duplicate Content Blocks, and Cross-Page Duplicate Content. Priority gaps: llms.txt File, Schema.org Structured Data, and Comprehensive FAQ Section. Topic coherence is moderate at 5/10, capping the score at 60. Tighter topical focus would lift this ceiling.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI44
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.