Weak AI visibility with 2 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
butter.dev currently has very low AEO readiness, with an overall score of 10 and foundational discovery signals missing across the stack. The site is crawlable over HTTPS and includes basic essentials like a title, meta description, one H1, and accessible text without JavaScript, but critical machine-readable signals are absent. Key blockers include no `llms.txt` (404), no JSON-LD schema blocks, no sitemap.xml (404), no canonical tags, and no FAQ or feed infrastructure. In its current state, AI engines can access the page, but have minimal structured context to trust, extract, and cite it.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.