Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
cakework.com is currently not AEO-ready, with an overall score of 29/100 and several foundational machine-readable signals missing. The highest structural strength is canonical setup (10/10), plus solid baseline crawlability and sitemap hygiene (7/10 each), but critical discovery and comprehension layers are absent. The site has no llms.txt (0), no JSON-LD schema coverage (0), no FAQ framework (0), no freshness signals (0), and no AI licensing directives (0), which materially limits citation and retrieval potential in AI systems.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.