Weak AI visibility with 2 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
caret.so has a solid technical base for crawlability, but it is not AEO-ready in its current state. The site performs well on foundational HTML signals (HTTPS enabled, semantic elements like main/nav/footer/section, and 50/50 images with alt text), yet core AI-discovery assets are missing: /llms.txt (404), /robots.txt (404), /sitemap.xml (404), and homepage JSON-LD schema (0 blocks, 0 types). Content is present and substantial (39,235 text characters), but extractability patterns are weak with 0 question headings, no direct Q&A structure, no tables, and no ordered lists. With a focused metadata + content-structure sprint, the domain can move quickly from low discoverability toward reliable AI citation readiness.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.