Moderate AI visibility with 5 of 10 criteria passing. Biggest gap: comprehensive faq section.
Verdict
caringkindnyc.org has a solid technical base for crawlability, with HTTPS, a working robots.txt, sitemap infrastructure, and Organization/WebSite schema on the homepage. It also publishes a valid llms.txt at https://caringkindnyc.org/llms.txt, which is a strong AEO signal. The main gaps are Q&A discoverability and FAQ depth: both /faq and /frequently-asked-questions return HTTP 404, and no FAQPage schema was detected in the homepage markup. Adding AI-specific robots rules, FAQ schema, and more original research-style content would materially improve AEO performance.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Most sites run default platform robots.txt with zero AI-specific rules. That's not a strategy -it's an accident. Explicit Allow rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot signal that your content is open for citation.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.