Weak AI visibility with 5 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: schema.org structured data.
Verdict
coba.ai has an AEO foundation but is currently under-optimized, with an overall score of 28/100. The strongest signal is a robust llms.txt implementation (10/10), but core discoverability infrastructure is missing: Schema.org data (0), sitemap completeness (0), RSS/Atom feed (0), schema depth (0), and AI permissions/licensing signals (0). Content quality signals are mixed, with some factual density and case-study evidence, but weak extraction structure (question formatting 2/10, FAQ 2/10, definition patterns 0/10). Without structured metadata and crawl guidance improvements, AI systems will have limited confidence and context when citing the site.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.