Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
codeparrot.ai has a technically crawlable foundation (HTTPS enabled, valid sitemap, and clean canonical setup), but it is not AEO-ready in its current state. The biggest blockers are missing machine-readable context: no `llms.txt` (404), no JSON-LD schema blocks, no FAQ/FAQPage schema, and no AI permissions file. Content is indexable and reasonably structured (`h1_count: 1`, semantic `main/nav/section`, `homepage_text_length: 8634`), yet it lacks extractable fact patterns, freshness markers, and expert/entity signals that AI engines rely on for confident citation.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.