Moderate AI visibility with 11 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: rss/atom feed.
Verdict
epsilla.com shows moderate AEO readiness with an overall score of 53/100: the technical foundation is solid, but extractable authority signals are thin. Strengths include a strong llms.txt implementation (10/10), clean crawlable HTML (9/10), and strong question-led formatting (8/10) that already supports answer extraction. The biggest constraints are missing canonical tags (0/10), no RSS/Atom feed (0/10), weak freshness signals (2/10), and very low factual data density (1/10), which reduce confidence for AI citation and ranking. Improving structured content depth, publishing metadata, and permission/ownership signals would materially raise AI visibility.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
You published a great blog post in January. It's now February and nothing else has appeared. AI engines notice -and they're crawling less often because of it.
Your comparison table looks great in the browser. But it's built with divs and CSS Grid, so ChatGPT sees a blob of text. Here's what that costs you.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.