Weak AI visibility with 9 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
getburnt.ai has a workable AEO foundation but is not yet citation-ready for modern AI engines. The site is technically crawlable (HTTPS enabled, robots.txt and sitemap both return 200, semantic HTML present, and 32 internal links), and it includes baseline Organization schema plus strong FAQ coverage. However, key machine-discovery assets are missing or thin, including `llms.txt` (404), RSS/Atom feed, direct Q&A formatting, definition patterns, and freshness signals such as `datePublished`/`dateModified` or sitemap `lastmod`. Overall, the site can be indexed, but it is under-structured for answer extraction and AI citation workflows.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.