Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
goclicks.ai has a solid technical base for indexing (HTTPS enabled, canonical configured, robots.txt and sitemap both accessible) and above-average schema implementation with 3 JSON-LD blocks covering Organization, FAQPage, and Service. However, AEO readiness is limited by major discoverability and extractability gaps: `/llms.txt` returns 404, `/ai.txt` is missing, homepage internal links are 0, and no question-format headings or direct Q&A structure were detected. Content authority signals are also thin, with no visible quantitative data, no case studies, no Person schema, and no freshness markup (`datePublished`/`dateModified`) despite a valid sitemap. Overall score 32 indicates foundational SEO hygiene is present, but AI citation readiness is currently underdeveloped.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
AI crawlers follow internal links to discover and contextualize content. A page with zero inbound links is a page AI will never find. Hub pages linking to 20+ related articles signal topical authority that both engines reward.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.