Weak AI visibility with 5 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
healthtech1.uk has a low AEO readiness score of 24/100, with 8 of 22 criteria marked MISSING and only 2 marked STRONG. Core machine-consumable signals are absent, including llms.txt (404), JSON-LD schema (0 blocks), RSS/Atom feeds, direct answer paragraphs, and definition/list structures. Technical crawl foundations are only partial: robots.txt is present but has no AI-specific directives, and the sitemap is valid with 24 URLs but contains no lastmod dates. The strongest positives are fact density (76 quantitative data points; score 8) and canonical strategy (self-referencing HTTPS canonical; score 10), but these are not yet converted into AI-friendly answer extraction and trust signals.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.