Weak AI visibility with 2 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
hillclimb.com has a technically crawlable foundation (HTTPS enabled, semantic elements like main/nav/section, and 8,320 characters of homepage text), but it is not AEO-ready in its current state. Core machine-readable signals are missing: `/llms.txt` returns 404, `robots.txt` returns 404, `sitemap.xml` returns 404, and no JSON-LD schema types were found (schema block count: 0). Content is readable but not answer-structured for AI extraction, with 0 question headings, 0 direct Q&A pairs, and no FAQ page at `/faq` (404). The current profile indicates high upside if foundational AEO files, schema, and answer-first content patterns are implemented.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.