What is AEO (AI Engine Optimization)?

AEO is the practice of structuring your website so AI answer engines - ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude - can find, understand, and cite it. SEO gets you ranked in search results. AEO gets you into AI-generated answers. Different game, different rules.

Is AEO only relevant for large businesses?

Not at all. Small businesses, local providers, niche e-commerce stores, solo consultants - they all benefit from AI visibility. We've seen smaller sites with well-structured content outperform larger competitors who haven't optimized for AI engines. Size matters less than structure.

Can AEO help with voice search and smart assistants?

Yes. Siri, Alexa, and Google Assistant increasingly pull AI-generated answers from web content. The same structured data, Q&A formatting, and entity authority that drive AEO also make your content the go-to source for voice search answers.

What is the difference between AI visibility and AI readiness?

Readiness is your technical foundation - whether your site has the right schema, llms.txt, clean HTML, and entity signals in place. Visibility is real-world performance - whether AI engines actually cite you when users ask relevant questions. You need readiness first, then visibility follows. Our audit measures readiness; our visibility analysis measures actual citation rates.

What does the free AEO audit include?

The free audit analyzes your website across 22 criteria that determine AI visibility, including llms.txt, Schema.org structured data, Q&A content format, clean crawlable HTML, entity authority, robots.txt AI policy, FAQ sections, original data, content freshness, fact density, canonical URLs, and more. You get a score out of 100 with specific findings and actionable recommendations.

host.milaconcierge.com - AEO Audit Report | 26/100

host.milaconcierge.comReal Estate & Property Property Technology

Weak AI visibility with 6 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: schema.org structured data.

Scoring Methodology

How Your AEO Score Is Calculated

A weighted average of 22 deterministic criteria. Each scored 0-10, each with a specific weight. No AI judgment calls - every point is traceable.

Minimal visibilityOut of 100 possible points

The Formula

Score = sum(criterion_score / 10 * weight * 100) / sum(weights)

Each criterion is scored 0-10 by deterministic checks, multiplied by its weight, and summed to produce a 0-100 overall score.

Your Score Breakdown

Content7 criteria

Q&A Content Format15%0/10+0.0

FAQ Sections10%0/10+0.0

Original Data10%0/10+0.0

Content Freshness7%2/10+1.4

Direct Answer Paragraphs7%0/10+0.0

Fact & Data Density5%3/10+1.5

Definition Patterns4%0/10+0.0

Subtotal58%+2.9

Structure5 criteria

Schema.org JSON-LD15%0/10+0.0

Clean, Crawlable HTML10%6/10+6.0

Semantic HTML55%8/10+4.0

Table & List Extractability7%2/10+1.4

Schema Coverage3%0/10+0.0

Subtotal40%+11.4

Discovery5 criteria

llms.txt10%10/10+10.0

robots.txt for AI5%5/10+2.5

Internal Linking10%3/10+3.0

Sitemap Completeness5%7/10+3.5

RSS/Atom Feed3%0/10+0.0

Subtotal33%+19.0

Trust Signals5 criteria

Entity Authority10%1/10+1.0

Content Licensing4%0/10+0.0

Author & Expert Schema4%2/10+0.8

Canonical URL4%10/10+4.0

Content Velocity3%3/10+0.9

Subtotal25%+6.7

Overall Score100%26/100

Score Ranges

86-100AI-first content architecture

71-85Strong AI visibility

56-70Moderate visibility

41-55Weak visibility

26-40Minimal visibility

0-25Not on the radar

Key Points

Schema.org and Q&A format carry the highest weight at 15% each across 22 total criteria.

No HTTPS means Clean HTML is capped at 3/10, costing approximately 3-4 overall points.

Every criterion uses deterministic checks. Same site, same audit, same score - every time.

Read full scoring methodology →

0-49

50-69

69-100

ContentCategory Average

0/10

StructureCategory Average

3/10

DiscoveryCategory Average

6/10

Trust SignalsCategory Average

3/10

Verdict

host.milaconcierge.com is currently at an early AEO maturity level with an overall score of 26/100, indicating limited readiness for AI answer engines despite solid technical foundations. The site performs well on llms.txt and canonical strategy (both 10/10), and has a valid sitemap (7/10), but critical machine-understandable signals are missing: Schema.org Structured Data (0/10), Schema Coverage Depth (0/10), FAQ (0/10), and Direct Answer Paragraphs (0/10). Content extraction is further constrained by weak information architecture, including only 4 internal links, no H1, no question headings, and no structured fact blocks. In short, the site is crawlable but not yet sufficiently structured or evidence-rich to be consistently cited in AI-generated answers.

Want Us to Improve This?

#85of 181 overall

#0of 0 in Real Estate & Property

View full rankings →

Scoreboard

Criteria

Status

Potential

Score

Answer-Format Readiness0/10 Q&A Format and 0/10 Direct AnswersPages are not shaped for extractive answers, reducing inclusion in synthesized AI responses.

Authority Content Depth0/10 Original Data & Expert Analysis; 3/10 Fact DensityInsufficient proprietary evidence and citations weakens trust and reduces quotable material.

Crawl Architecture Signals4 internal links; 0 question headings; 0 H1 tagsThin internal pathways and weak heading hierarchy limit semantic context propagation across the site.

Fix It With AI

Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.

These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.

Top Opportunities

Improve Your Score

Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement

Criteria0/10

Schema.org JSON-LD: The Scoreboard AI Actually Reads

Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.

MediumHigh impactRead guide →

Criteria0/10

Q&A Content Format: Write Like AI Reads

AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.

EasyHigh impactRead guide →

Criteria0/10

FAQ Sections: 87 Questions Turned Our Score Into 88

Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.

MediumHigh impactRead guide →

Criteria0/10

Original Data: The Content AI Can't Find Anywhere Else

AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.

HardHigh impactRead guide →

Want us to improve your score?

We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.

Let's Talk

Verdict

Scoreboard

Fix It With AI

Top Opportunities

Deploy Core JSON-LD Schema

Build Q&A-First Content Blocks

Launch a Dedicated FAQ Hub

Strengthen Entity Authority and Trust Signals

Expand Internal Linking and Topic Clusters

Publish Original Data, Case Studies, and Expert Content

Improve Freshness and Publication Signaling

Add AI Policy and Feed Distribution Layer

Increase Extractable Structure in Body Content

Improve Your Score

Related Questions

Want us to improve your score?