Moderate AI visibility with 12 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: comprehensive faq section.
Verdict
inkeep.com shows moderate AEO readiness with an overall score of 51/100, anchored by strong technical signals like `llms.txt` (10/10), sitemap completeness (9/10), RSS feed (10/10), and publishing velocity (10/10). However, answer extraction readiness is constrained by missing FAQ coverage (0/10), missing canonical tags (0/10), absent list/table structures (0/10), and weak direct-answer formatting (3/10). The site has strong crawl and entity foundations, but it needs clearer answer-oriented content architecture and metadata completeness to compete in AI-generated results.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
You published a great blog post in January. It's now February and nothing else has appeared. AI engines notice -and they're crawling less often because of it.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.