Weak AI visibility with 5 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
insights.miro.com shows low AEO readiness with an overall score of 25/100, mainly because core machine-readable foundations are missing. Eight criteria scored 0, including llms.txt (404), JSON-LD structured data, direct answer paragraphs, author schema, and schema coverage depth. The site does have strengths to build on, notably canonical URL strategy (10/10), fact/data density (8/10 with 165 quantitative data points), and baseline crawl access via robots.txt and sitemap (5-6/10). Priority should be establishing AI-facing governance files and schema, then restructuring content for extractable Q&A and freshness signals.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Same content, three URLs, zero canonical tags. Congratulations -you just split your authority three ways and gave AI crawlers a headache.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.