Moderate AI visibility with 18 of 34 criteria passing. Biggest gap: comprehensive faq section.
Verdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 52/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Internal Linking Structure, and RSS/Atom Feed. Priority gaps: Comprehensive FAQ Section, Sitemap Completeness, and Content Publishing Velocity.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI29
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 34 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
AI doesn't take your word for it. When you publish content as "Admin" or "Staff Writer," you're telling AI engines that nobody at your company was willing to put their name on it. Person schema, author bios, and credential markup are how you prove a real expert wrote your content.
A page built with <div> everywhere looks the same to AI as a page with no structure at all. Semantic elements -<main>, <article>, <section>, <time> -are the markup that tells AI where your content starts, what it means, and how it's organized.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.