Weak AI visibility with 4 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
latenthealth.com has a solid technical base for crawlability (HTTPS enabled, one H1, semantic elements like main/nav/footer/section, and 20 internal links), but it is not AEO-ready in its current state. Core machine-readable signals are missing: `llms.txt` returns 404, `sitemap.xml` returns 404, no JSON-LD schema types were found, and no canonical URL is declared. Content is present and substantial (30,799 text characters with 18 quantitative data points), yet extractability is weak due to zero list/table structures, zero question headings, and no freshness metadata such as `<time>` or `dateModified`. The site needs foundational structured-data, indexing, and answer-format upgrades before it can compete for AI-engine citations.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.