Weak AI visibility with 10 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
luel.ai has a strong technical foundation for crawlability and maintenance, but it is not AEO-ready yet because core machine-readable trust signals are missing. The site performs well on canonicalization (self-referencing HTTPS canonical), internal linking (23 internal links), and freshness infrastructure (45 sitemap URLs with 42 updated in the last 90 days). However, critical gaps include no `llms.txt` (404), no JSON-LD schema (`schema_block_count: 0`, `schema_types_found: []`), no FAQ endpoint (`/faq` returns 404), and no RSS/Atom feed, which materially limits AI engine understanding and citation potential.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.