Weak AI visibility with 5 of 10 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
memorycarehs.org has strong crawl foundations (server-rendered pages, healthy XML sitemap index, and consistent navigation), but its AEO readiness is constrained by missing AI-specific controls and weak FAQ implementation. `https://memorycarehs.org/llms.txt` returns HTTP 404, and `robots.txt` has no explicit GPTBot/ClaudeBot policy. Structured data exists broadly via Yoast JSON-LD, but it is mostly `WebPage`/`WebSite`/`BreadcrumbList` and does not implement `FAQPage` on the FAQ archive or item URLs. The site shows credible authority signals through clear NAP and deep original organizational materials (annual reports, Form 990s, GUIDE program content), creating a strong base for rapid AEO uplift.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Most sites run default platform robots.txt with zero AI-specific rules. That's not a strategy -it's an accident. Explicit Allow rules for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot signal that your content is open for citation.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.