Moderate AI visibility with 29 of 48 criteria passing. Biggest gap: q&a content format.
Developer Tools & InfrastructureDeveloper PlatformsVerdict
Below-average AEO readiness at 51/100 - multiple areas need attention. Key strengths include llms.txt File, Canonical URL Strategy, and Content Cannibalization. Priority gaps: Q&A Content Format, Comprehensive FAQ Section, and Content Licensing & AI Permissions.
How to Improve
Top Opportunities10
Fix It With AI41
Score Breakdown
Unlock Full Audit Report
See all 48 criteria with detailed findings and actionable fix recommendations.
Your competitors are already optimizing for AI
Every day without action is traffic your site loses to AI-ready competitors. We fix that.
Site Pages
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
You want AI engines to cite your content. But have you actually told them they're allowed to? Most sites haven't -and AI systems default to conservative behavior.
Voice assistants need to pick which paragraph to read aloud from your page. Without Speakable markup, they guess -and they frequently guess wrong, reading your cookie notice.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.