Weak AI visibility with 4 of 10 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
nlsadultcenter.com has a technically crawlable WordPress foundation with valid XML sitemaps and baseline JSON-LD from Yoast, but it is not yet optimized for AI retrieval use cases. The site is missing `llms.txt`, has no dedicated FAQ URL (`/faq` and `/frequently-asked-questions` both return HTTP 404), and provides no AI-specific crawler directives in `robots.txt`. Entity basics (organization name, address, phone, email) are present on the homepage, but deeper authority signals like expert bios, original research, and structured FAQ/Q&A markup are limited or absent.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.