Weak AI visibility with 7 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
onlook.com has a solid technical base for AI visibility in a few core areas, including HTTPS, a correct self-referencing canonical URL, and active JSON-LD coverage for Organization and FAQPage. The site also has substantial crawlable text and a working FAQ presence, which are strong extraction signals. However, foundational AI-discovery infrastructure is missing: `llms.txt`, `robots.txt`, `sitemap.xml`, RSS/Atom feed, and `ai.txt` all return absent states (404 or not found). Combined with weak internal linking (2 links), no factual/statistical density, and no author/expert schema, overall AEO readiness is currently limited.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
AI has a trust hierarchy for sources. At the top: proprietary data and first-hand expert analysis. At the bottom: rewritten Wikipedia articles. We've watched AI preferentially cite sites with original benchmarks -even over bigger competitors.
AI crawlers follow internal links to discover and contextualize content. A page with zero inbound links is a page AI will never find. Hub pages linking to 20+ related articles signal topical authority that both engines reward.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.