Weak AI visibility with 3 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
piggyrobotics.com has a very low AEO readiness profile (overall score: 15) despite solid technical crawlability basics like HTTPS, a valid title/meta description, and substantial indexable text (9,178 characters) available without JavaScript. The largest blockers are missing machine-readable discovery and trust layers: `llms.txt` (404), `robots.txt` (404), `sitemap.xml` (404), zero JSON-LD schema blocks, and no canonical URL strategy. Content is present but not structured for AI extraction, with no FAQ page, no question-format headings, no direct answer paragraphs, and only one internal link on the homepage. In short, the foundation is crawlable, but the site lacks the explicit signals AI engines need to understand, trust, and cite it.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Tidio runs 4 JSON-LD schema types. Crisp runs zero. That's not a coincidence -it's the difference between a 63 and a 34. Structured data is the machine-readable layer AI trusts most.
Our site runs 87 FAQ items across 9 categories with FAQPage schema on every one. That's not excessive -it's how we hit 88/100. Each Q&A pair is a citation opportunity AI can extract in seconds.
No date on your page? AI engines treat it like a rumor -undated and deprioritized. Here's how we audit whether your timestamps are actually machine-readable.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.