Weak AI visibility with 12 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
pingo.ai has a solid technical base for AEO with strong schema implementation (3 JSON-LD blocks, including Organization and FAQPage), a valid HTTPS setup, and a clean canonical strategy. However, readiness is materially constrained by missing machine-consumption assets and policy signals: `/llms.txt` returns 404, no `ai.txt` is present, and no RSS/Atom feed is discoverable. Discoverability depth is also limited by only 3 homepage internal links, a 2-URL sitemap without `lastmod`, and no dedicated `/faq` page. Net: the site shows good extraction potential but needs foundational AI crawler and freshness infrastructure to improve citation likelihood.
Scoreboard
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
AI assistants are question-answering machines. When your content is already shaped as questions and answers, you're handing AI a pre-formatted citation. Sites that do this right get extracted -sites that don't get skipped.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.