Weak AI visibility with 9 of 22 criteria passing. Biggest gap: llms.txt file.
Verdict
pirros.com has a foundational AEO base but is not yet AI-ready, with an overall score of 39/100. Strengths include clean crawlable HTML (9/10), internal linking (7/10), sitemap completeness (7/10), and semantic structure/accessibility (7/10), which provide solid technical footing. Visibility risk is driven by missing machine-consumption assets and attribution signals: llms.txt (0/10), RSS/Atom feed (0/10), table/list extractability (0/10), AI permissions/licensing (0/10), plus weak FAQ and freshness signals (2/10 each). In short, Pirros has discoverability infrastructure but needs explicit AI-oriented governance, schema depth, and answer formatting to compete in answer engines.
Scoreboard
Fix It With AI
Copy-paste these prompts into Claude Code or Cursor to fix each criterion.
These prompts are designed for projects where you have direct access to the codebase (Next.js, React, static HTML, WordPress, etc.). If your site runs on a hosted platform like Webflow, switch to the "Webflow" tab for platform-specific instructions. Using a different hosted platform? Contact us for custom guidance.
Top Opportunities
Improve Your Score
Guides for the criteria with the most room for improvement
Tidio has a 251-line llms.txt. Crisp has zero. The score gap: +29 points. This single file tells AI assistants exactly what your site does -and without it, they're guessing.
Sitemaps tell crawlers what exists. RSS feeds tell them what changed. If you don't have one, your new content waits days -or weeks -to be discovered.
Your sitemap says 500 pages exist. Our crawl finds 700. Those 200 missing URLs? AI crawlers will never know they exist.
AI engines are citation machines -they need specific facts to quote. A page full of general advice with zero data points gives them nothing to work with.
Want us to improve your score?
We build citation-ready content that AI engines choose as the answer.